为了正常的体验网站,请在浏览器设置里面开启Javascript功能!
首页 > 新女性_形象的实质——从女性主义的角度解读嘉莉妹妹

新女性_形象的实质——从女性主义的角度解读嘉莉妹妹

2013-12-15 5页 pdf 287KB 108阅读

用户头像

is_862234

暂无简介

举报
新女性_形象的实质——从女性主义的角度解读嘉莉妹妹 LITERATURE ZhaoYina/ThenatureofCarrie’simageof“newwoman’’—————————————————?—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————一~ TheNatureofCarrie’sImageof“newwoman" AFeministReadingofSisterCarrie oZhaoYina (CollegeofForeignLanguages,HebeiNorma...
新女性_形象的实质——从女性主义的角度解读嘉莉妹妹
LITERATURE ZhaoYina/ThenatureofCarrie’simageof“newwoman’’—————————————————?—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————一~ TheNatureofCarrie’sImageof“newwoman" AFeministReadingofSisterCarrie oZhaoYina (CollegeofForeignLanguages,HebeiNormalUniversity,Shijiazhuang,Hebei050016) 【Abstract]IntheAmericanliteraryhistory。SisterCarriehasbeenacontroversialfigureallalong.Thecriticsre. gardCarrieeitherasa“fallenwoman’’orasa“newwoman”.ThisthesisaimstoexplorethenatureofCarrie,simageasa “newwoman”fromtheperspectiveoffeminisminordertoexposeheridentityasthe“other”inthepatriarchalsociety. Meanwhile,thenatureofCarrie’simagealsorevealsthatDreisercannotcompletelyexceedthedominantideologyofthatpe. riodandthatheshowsambivalentviewsofwomanhoodinthecontextoftheriseof“newwoman”inthe19”century. [Keywords]“newwoman”;other;subject;feminism [中图分类号]1106.4【文献标识码]A [文章编号】1672.8610(2007)08-0056-04 I.Introduction SisterCarrie,whichrelentlesslyandhonestly presentsthetruenatureofAmericanlife。isTheodore Dreiser,sfirstnaturalisticnovel.Asamilestoneinthe historyofAmericanliterature,ithasbecomethequin. tessentialmodernAmericannovel.However.when publishedin1900,SisterCarrieshockedthepublic.In fact.itwassocontroversialatthatperiodthatitwas suppressedbyitspublisher,whoprintedbutrefusedto promotethebook.Ontheonehand,thenoveltears themaskofgentilitytopiecesandwritesaboutthe helplessnessandtheinsignificanceofthemantore— storetherealisticfacetoflife;ontheotherhand,it depictsthesocialtransgressionsbycharactersthatfeel nomoreremorseandlargelyescapepunishment.The portrayaloftheheroine,Carrie,whocohabitswith DrouetandthenelopeswithHurstwoodandfinallybe— comesamostcelebratedstar.iscontrarytothecon。 ventionalmoralvaluesandthedominantideologyof thatperiod.What,sworse,Dreisermakesnomoral judgmentonhischaracter’saction,whichannounces hisconfusionandlossinmora】values. 56 Thisthesisisto’explorehowCarriebecomesthe so—called‘‘newwoman”stepbystep,andtooffera feministreadingtoanalyzethetruenatureofthe“new woman”inthepatriarchalsocietyinthe19-century America,andtostudyDreiser’sambivalentviewof womanhoodundertheinfluenceofthemainstreamide. ologyofthatperiod. Thedevelopmentintoa“newwoman” Inthenineteenthcentury,man’s“sphere’’wasin thepublicworld,particularlythemarketplace,where hiscompetitivetendenciescouldbechanneledtobene— fithisfamilyandsocietyasawhole,whereaswoman’s proper“sphere”wasathometodevelopherinnate nurturingtendencies.HistorianBarbaraWelterde— scribesthenineteenthcenturyidealforthewhitemid- dleclasses:“thetruewoman,wasexpectedtobepi. OUS,pure,domestic,andsubmissive.’’⋯However。 the“newwoman”madethedebutpushedbythefirst waveoffeministmovementbetweentheyear1880sand 1920s.The“newwoman”,typicallypossessingstrong self-consciousnessandrelativelyindependentpersonali- ty,hada careerandwaseconomicallyindependent. 【作者简介】赵一娜,女,河北师范大学外国语学院研究生,研究方向:英语语言文学。 万方数据 语文学刊(高教·外文版) 2007年第8期 Dreiser’sheroine,Carrie,acompetingmodelforfemi- ninity,isatransitionalfiguremovingfromtheVictori- anmodelof“truewoman”towardsrecognizablemod— ern“newwoman”. First,thethesisistoexplorehowCarriedevelops intoa“newwoman”underthecircumstancesofthat period.ItshouldbeadmittedthattheimageofCarrie, fromanordinarylow··paidwagerusticgirltoa high·· paidactress,virtuallyrewritestheconventional“femi— ninity”.AtthearrivalofChicago,Carriewantstode— pendonmantosatisfyhermaterialdesire,whichre- vealsherconventional“femininity”.Sowhenshefails inhuntingforajob,sheaccepts“thetwosoft,green, handsometen—dollarbills’’atlastthoughsheprotestsat thebeginning.Likemostoftheconventionalwomen, Carrieplacesherhopeonman(bothDrouetand Hurstwood)toshieldherselffromthetrouble.Withre— gardtothispoint,Dreisermakesthecomment: Shemighthavebeensaidtobeimaginingherselfin love,whenshewasnot.Womenfrequentlydothis.It ftowsfromthefuctthatineachexistsabiastoward驴 fection,acravingforthepleasureofbeingloved.The longingtobeshielded,bettered,sympathizedwith,is oueoftheattributesofthes麟.This.coupledwithsenti- mentandanaturaltendencytoemotion,oftenmakes refusingdiffwult.Itpersuadesthemthattheyarein ZD倪.[1] Possessingtheconceptoftheconventionalfemi- ninity,Carrieis preventedfromself-development. That’swhyshedoesn’ttrytomakeuseofherownabili— tytoearnherownlivingaftershediscovershertalent inperformancebyaccident.Ineffect,shehasbeen wonttolivewithoutworriesundertheprotectionof men. Itisnotuntilherhopestowardsmenarecrashed thatshebeginstobeself-dependent.Whenshediscov- orsthatHurstwooddeceivedherandsupposesthat Drouethaslefther,shemakesadecisiontogetaposi- tionoutside.Dreisersays: Shelooksfornothingsavewhatmightcomelegiti- matelyandwithouttheappearanceofspecialfavor.She wantedsomething,butnomanshouldbuyherbyfulse protestationorfavor.Sheproposedtoearnherliving honestly.[11 Herdecisiontoearnherownlivingindicatesher awakeningofself—consciousness.Furthermore,com— paredwiththejob-huntingforthefirsttime,sheis morecourageousandconfident,althoughshestillcon— frontsmanydifficulties. WhenHurstwoodistrappedinpoverty,Carriere— solvestogetapositiononthestageagain.However, Hurstwoodisopposedtoherdecisionandsays:“If1 wereyou1 wouldn’tthinkofit.It’snotmuchofapro- fessionforawoman.’’。1 1 Inspiteoftheoppositionof Hurstwood.Carrie“secretlyresolvedtotry”.“She wasnotgoingtobedraggedintopovertyandsomething worsetosuithim.Shecouldact.Shecouldgetsome— thingandworkup.Whatwouldhesaythen?’’。11Itis asdifficultasbeforeforCarrietoapplyforajobthis time,butwithcourageandperseverance,atlengthshe getsapositioninthechorus,andfromthenonshegets astart.Eventually.Carriebecomesanewstarandful- fillstheserf-realization.Dreisercommentsintheno. vel: T/m/dasCarriewas,shewasstrongincapability. Therelianceofothersmadeherfeelasifshemust,and whenshemustshedared.Experienceoftheworldand ofnecessitywasinherfavor.Nolongerhadthe坛htest wordofamanmadeherheadd叻.Shehadlearned thatmencouldchangeandfailed.Flatteryinitsmost palpablefomhadlostitsforcewithher.Itrequiredsu— periority·-kindlysuperiority-·tomoveher··thesuperiorityof ageniuslikeAmes.【1】 Gettingridofthemodelofstay·-at-·homewifeand mother,Carrieentersthepublicworld,becomeseco— nomicallyindependentandachievestheself-realiza— tion.Fromtheperspectiveof、themoralcanonatthat period,Dreiser’sviewofwomanhoodisvirtuallyrevo— lutionaryandexceedsthemainstreamideologyofthat periodtosomeextent.ItseemsthatCarriehasbecome a“newwoman”.However.behindtheimageof“new woman”.Carriestillexistsasthe“other”inthecon— temporarysociety. HI.Thenatureofthe“newwoman’’ ThebasicfeministviewisthatWesterncivilization ispervasivelypatriarchal,thatis,itismale-centered andcontrolled,andisorganizedandconductedinsuch awayastosubordinatewomentomeninallcultural domains.JustasSimonedeBeauvoirputsit,“One"is notborn。butratherbecomes。awoman.Itisciviliza. tionasawholethatproducesthiscreature.Onlythein. 57 万方数据 LITERATURE ZhaoYina/ThenatureofCarrie‘simageof“newwoman” terventionofsomeoneelsecanestablishanindividual asanother.”c2] NomatterhowsuccessfulCarrieis,sheisstill controlledanddefinedbymaninthepatriarchalsocie- ty.Inthenovel,Carrieisonlylikeanobjectfrom Drout’shandstoHurstwood’s.Andherjob-huntingis alwaysrelativetomen.WhenCarrieknowsthedeceit ofHurstwoodandquarrelswithDroeutbecauseofher relationwithHurstwood,shereallydecidestofinda jobtoearnherownlivingandshedoesdoit.Howev· er,theprocessisworthnoting: Anyhow,therewasonechangeforthebetter.She knewthatshehadimprovedinappearance.Herman— nerhadvastlychanged.Herclotheswerebecoming, andmen-well—dressedmen,someofthiskindwhobe. forehadgazedatherindifferentlyfrombehindtheir polishedrailingsandimposingofficepartitions-now gazedintoherfacewithasoftlightintheireyes.I ll Inthewholeprocess,sheisjudgedbythemen, andsheisconfidentandcourageousonlybecauseshe thinksthemenappreciateherelegantmannerand beautifulappearancenow.SimonedeBeauvoirsays: “Thushumanityismaleandmandefineswomannotin herselfbutasrelativetohim;sheisnotregardedasan autonomousbeing’’[4。.Atthebeginningofherarrival atChicago,Carrieisonly“prettywiththeinsipidpret— tinessoftheformativeperiod”,and“intheintuitive gracesshewasstillcrude.Shecouldscarcelytossher headgracefully.Herhandswerealmostineffectual. Thefeet,thoughsmall,weresetflatly.”[1】Atthat time,Carrieispure,innocent,prettybutnotelegant andconfidentintheeyesofmen,whichisattributedto herfailureingettinga position.Bycontrast,itis muchmoreevidentthatCarrieisalwaysbeingdecreed byman,andthewholesocietyjudgesCarriethrough theeyesofman. SimonedeBeauvoirsupposesthatwomanisrive- tedintoalop—sidedrelationshipwithmen,andthathe isthe“one”.shethe“other”.TheinstructionCarrie receivesfromDrouetindicatesthispoint.AfterCarrie cohabitswithDrouet,Drouetbeginstoeducateher. HewouldsaytoCarrie:“Didyouseethatwomanwho wentbyjustnow?Finestepper,wash’tshe?”Carrie would“observethegracecommended”..andthen“i‘n— stinctively,shefeltadesiretoimitateit”.AndCarrie “tooktheinstructionaffably”.Carrie,theinnate 58 beauty,reallyhasthedesiretoimproveherappearance andmanner,butherconceptaboutbeautyisinstilled bymen.Asamatteroffact,Carrieisalwaysdomina- tedbymen.Beauvoirsays:“sheistheincidental,the inessentialasopposedtotheessential.Heisthesub— ject.heistheabsolute--sheistheother.’’⋯What,s worse,thewomenalsosurrenderthemselvestothe dominance.Asismentionedabove,Carrie“tookthe instructionaffably”.Itisbelievedthat“womenthem— selvesaretaught,intheprocessofbeingsocialized,to internalizethereigningpatriarchalideology,andsoare conditionedtoderogatetheirownsexandtocooperate intlIeirownsubordination.’’[4】 Atlength,althoughCarriegetsridofmenandbe- comeseconomicallyindependent,herspiritisstillcon— trolledbymen,andshealwaysexistsasthe“other”. TheappearanceofAmesinthelatterpartofthenovel representsthispointmetaphorically.Amesisanintel— leetualandthoughtfulman,andfacingmaterialism—ori— entedpeopleandworld,hehasanotherstandardof moralityandhestandsforthespiritualworld.When theygotothesplendidrestaurantatFifthAvenueto havedinner,Amescomments:“Isometimesthinkitis ashameforpeopletospendsomuchmoneythisway”, and“theypaysomuchmorethanthesethingsare worth.Theyputonsomuchshow.’’[1】Carriefeels surprisedathisremarksatfirst,andthenshethinks that“hewasbettereducatedthanshewas”andthat “hismindwasbetter”.Aftergettingherstart。Carrie beginstocomparethemenaroundherwithAmes:“It requiredsuperiority--kindlysuperiority--tomove her—tllesuperiorityofageniuslikeAmes.”If]What,s more,undertheinfluenceofAmes,Carrie,whohas nointerestinbooksatall,beginstoread.ItisAmes whotakesCarriefromthepurematerialworldtothe spiritualworld;whereasMrs.Vanceonlyincitesherto themateriallife.ThiscontrastindicatesthatCarrie,s spiritualworldisunderthedominanceofmenwhile womanseemshasnothingtodowithideasandintelli— gence· ThemodelofCarrie—aSuccessful“newwoman” subvertstheimageoftheconventionalwoman,andto someextentitindicatesthattheemergingofthe“new woman”greatlythreatenstheconventionalpatriarchal society,whichrepresentsDreiser’srevolutionaryas— pect.However,thenatureofCarrie’simagerevealshis 万方数据 语文学刊(高教·外文版) 2007耳第8期 ambivalentviewsofwomanhood.Thisalsoindicates thatDreisercouldn’tcompletelyexceedthedominant ideologyatthatperiod. 1V.Conclusion Dreisersuccessfullyportraysa transitionalfigure whotransf01T/ISfromtheconventionalimagetoa“new woman”attheturnofthecentury.However.nomat. terhowsuccessfulCarrieiS,shestillexistsasthe “other”inthepatriarchalsociety,andineffect,sheis alwaysunderthedominanceofmen.Ontheonehand。 Dreisercravesfortherevolutionintheculturerepre. sentedby“newwoman”;ontheotherhand,hefeels scaredwiththedestroyingeffeCtoftherevolution.And thisisthereasonwhyhegivesupthemoraljudgment atlast.Althoughthenovelwascontroversialbecauseof itsdeparturefromtheconventionalmoralvaluesofthat period,ithascometoberegardedasthequintessential modernAmericannovel.AndDreiser,thoughheis unabletoexceedthedominantideologythoroughly, makesanewstartforthelatergenerations. 【References】 [1]TheodoreDreiser.SisterCarrie[M].兴界图书出版社, 2000. [2]RamanSelden,PeterWiddowson&PeterBrookcr.A Reader’sGuidetoContemporaryLiteraryTheory[M].For— eiguLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2005:127. [3]SimonedeBeauvoir.TheSecondSex[M].1949. [4]M.H.Abrams.AGlossaryofLiteraryTerms[M].Foreign LanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2005:89. “新女性"形象的实质 ——从女性主义的角度解读嘉莉妹妹 赵一娜 (河北师范大学外国语学院,河北石家庄050016) [摘 要] 在美国文学史上。嘉莉妹妹一直是颇具争议的人物形象,评论界对其一直毁誉参半。笔者试图 从女性主义的角度来分析嘉莉妹妹作为“新女性”的实质,从而来揭示在当时的男权社会中,嘉莉这个所谓的新女 性仍然是男性的他者,指出小说并没有超越社会文化根源。同时,这也体现了在新女性崛起的19世纪德莱塞并不 能完全超越当时的主流意识以及他的女性观的内在矛盾性。 [关键词] 新女性;他者;主体;女性主义 【英文校对】HartNing (上接第48页) 《珍妮姑娘》的女性主义分析 江悦 (北京交通大学人文与社会科学学院,北京100044) [摘 要] 《珍妮姑娘》是德莱塞作品中一部不常被人们提及的长篇小说。以往大部分文学评论家主要从现实主义的 角度对这篇小说进行了评析。本文将立意于一个新的角度——女性主义对《珍妮姑娘》重新审阅。笔者力图从父权主义和女 性形象两方面对这部小说进行阐释,试图揭示导致珍妮悲惨命运的真正原因。 [关键词】珍妮;父权主义;女性形象 【英文校对】HanNing 59 万方数据 "新女性"形象的实质——从女性主义的角度解读嘉莉妹妹 作者: 赵一娜, Zhao Yina 作者单位: 河北师范大学外国语学院,河北,石家庄,050016 刊名: 语文学刊 英文刊名: JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE STUDIES 年,卷(期): 2007(8) 参考文献(4条) 1.M.H.Abrams A Glossary of Literary Terms 2005 2.Simone de Beauvoir The Second Sex 1949 3.Raman Selden;Peter Widdowson;Peter Brooker A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory 2005 4.Theodore Dreiser Sister Carrie 2000 本文链接:http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_ywxk200708018.aspx
/
本文档为【新女性_形象的实质——从女性主义的角度解读嘉莉妹妹】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑, 图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。 本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。 网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
热门搜索

历史搜索

    清空历史搜索