Gate Review Summary Template - David Webber:门审查汇总
-戴维韦伯
A Deliverable to the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
DHS ICE Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
Information Technology Engineering Services Support (ITESS)
(DHS ICE OCIO ITESS) Contract
FINAL ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN REVIEW SUMMARY: ENTERPRISE DATA MODELING TOOL (EDMT), RELEASE 1.0
ARCHITECTURE
Task Order No.: ITESS-0056-A (OPT 3): Architecture
FINAL
September 4, 2008
ITESS-0056-A-JP-00986
Prepared for: DHS Prepared by: SAIC/Contract No.: COW-5D-C-0056
ITESS-0056-A-JP-00986 September 4, 2008
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Final Architecture and Design Review (FADR) meeting for the Enterprise Data Modeling Tool (EDMT), Release 1.0, was held electronically on September 4, 2008. The system was approved to proceed to the next System Lifecycle Management (SLM) phase. 2.0 EMAIL RECIPIENTS
The e-mail recipients are listed below:
DHS Architecture Services
Rafaa Abdalla Barbara Dillon
Phil Letowt Patricia Donnelly
Sue Richland Brenda Hamilton
Janza Pullen
3.0 DOCUMENTATION DELIVERY STATUS
Exhibit 1 lists the documentation delivery status for EDMT Release 1.0.
Exhibit 1: EDMT Release 1.0 Documentation Delivery Status
Document ELDN Status
Design Document 180524 Submitted to ELMS on 7/31/08
Project Management Plan (PMP) 180524 Submitted to ELMS on 8/13/08
ICE Data Modeling Software Tool Evaluation 180686 Submitted to ELMS on 8/10/08
and Recommendation (SRD)
4.0 APPROVAL CERTIFICATION
The attached Approval Certification (AC) for the EDMT Release 1.0 FADR reflects the SLM line items required for this Phase and the “Yes,” “No,” and “N/A” status of each. Any item marked as “No” or “N/A” may have an accompanying comment in the Comment Section of the AC. Following a review of the line items on the AC, the stakeholders or their representatives provided approval. The e-mail notices appended to the AC reflect the official “signatures” of these stakeholders.
1
Attachment A
Approval Certification
FADR Approval Certification EDMT Release 1.0
Enterprise Data Modeling Tool (EDMT) Release 1.0
Final Architecture and Design Review Approval Certification
Certification Question Yes No N/A 1. Are the contents of the following documents acceptable within the context of the expected state for Final Architecture and Design review purposes?
X , Acquisition Plan
X , Design Document
X , Data Conversion Plan
X , Data Management Plan (DMP) – Logical and Physical Models
X , Development Test Plan (DTP)
X , Interface Control Agreement (ICA)
X , Information Technology Change Request(s) (ITCR)
X , Project Management Plan (PMP)
X , Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM)
X , Service Level Agreements (SLA)
X , System Requirements Document (SRD)
X , System Workload Analysis Document (SWAD)
, Development Security Test and Evaluation Plan / SSA Appendix H-Security Test X and Evaluation Plan and Procedures
X , Interconnection Security Agreement
2. Is the inventory of hardware, COTS software, custom software, and supporting X infrastructure comprehensively described?
3. Has the final hardware configuration been mapped to the production infrastructure X environment?
4. Can the final hardware and software configuration be supported by ICE Operations and X Engineering support teams?
X 5. Have appropriate and approved architectural standards been applied where reasonable? 6. Have the appropriate Service Level Agreements (SLA) been initiated with the production X support teams (Application Hosting Services [AHS], Database Administration, etc.) 7. Are the proposed software, hardware, and infrastructure components within the final
X design used in the way they were intended to be used (i.e., no over-customization, no
overuse or overkill of products and/or technologies)?
8. Has the potential for reuse of functional and architectural components within the final X design been exposed?
X 9. Have existing enterprise and/or reusable components and/or services been leveraged? 10. Is the final configuration consistent with the scalability, availability, and reliability X requirements as described in the SRD and SWAD?
11. Have all non-standard aspects of the final design been highlighted, discussed, and X approved (i.e., IT Change Requests)?
Certification Question Yes No N/A ICE OCIO Architecture Division September 4, 2008 A-1 FADR AC v. 022508
FADR Approval Certification EDMT Release 1.0
12. Has a schedule been proposed or accepted for disposal of any remaining issues X associated with non-standard aspects of the final design?
13. Is the final design of the software adequately described through the use of pseudo-X code, data flows, sequence diagrams, class diagrams, or other description techniques?
14. Is the final design (either as an independent or integrated system) testable from both a X functional and performance perspective in an independent test environment?
15. Have all proposed software, hardware, and infrastructure components in the final
X design been identified, and has it been shown how they are used within the business
processes?
X 16. Does the final design exclude the retention of Social Security Numbers?
X 17. Does the final design comply with all Section 508 accessibility requirements?
X 18. Does the final design meet all formal requirements?
X 19. Does the final design comply with security requirements?
X 20. Does the final design have an acceptable level of risk?
Comments:
, The Data Conversion Plan, Data Management Plan, Requirements Traceability Matrix, SEB Service
Level Agreements, System Workload Analysis Document, Data Migration Plan, Training Plan, Training
Strategies Worksheet, and the Deployment Plan were tailored out per the PTP
, Section 508 Compliance (#17) – Per vendor, the software is 508 Compliant
, Project team in the process of procuring the software license
Concurring stakeholders:
IT Project Manager Phil Letowt/Mini Kanwal
Systems Engineering Branch Director Sue Richland
Information Assurance Division Manager Rafaa Abdalla
Approving stakeholder:
Architecture Division Director Phil Letowt
ICE OCIO Architecture Division September 4, 2008 A-2 FADR AC v. 022508
FADR Approval Certification EDMT Release 1.0
From: Letowt, Philip J [mailto:pjletowt@fins3.dhs.gov] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:28 AM
To: Pullen, Janza; McCullough, Ginny
Cc: Donnelly, Patricia C; Dillon, Barbara A; Hamilton, Brenda Subject: RE: FINAL APPROVAL CERTIFICATION: EDMT Electronic FADR - PLEASE RESPOND
Approved
From: Richland, Susan A [mailto:sarichla@fins3.dhs.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:40 PM
To: Pullen, Janza
Cc: Weinig, Martin (CTR); Rhoads, Gerald P; Scott, Mark H; Tse, William K; Justice, Aaron (CTR)
Subject: RE: FINAL APPROVAL CERTIFICATION: EDMT Electronic FADR - PLEASE RESPOND
SEB concurs.
Thanks,
Susan Richland
Director, Systems Engineering Branch
Engineering Division
Office of the Chief Information Officer
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
202-732-2208
susan.richland@dhs.gov
-------------------------------------------
From: Abdalla, Rafaa M
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:49:42 AM
To: ICE-SLMREVIEW; Letowt, Philip J
Cc: 'Doug McKenna'; Dillon, Barbara A; Donnelly, Patricia C;
Hamilton, Brenda; 'Pullen, Janza'
Subject: RE: FINAL APPROVAL CERTIFICATION: EDMT Electronic FADR - PLEASE RESPOND
Auto forwarded by a Rule
Approve!
ICE OCIO Architecture Division September 4, 2008 A-3 FADR AC v. 022508