纯粹经济损失论文：纯粹经济损失 侵权法 赔偿责任制度

纯粹经济损失：纯粹经济损失 侵权法 赔偿责任制度 纯粹经济损失论文:纯粹经济损失 侵权法 赔偿责任制度 【中文摘要】纯粹经济损失是欧洲法中的概念,除了极少数国家在成文法中明文规定了纯粹经济损失外,其他国家多只是在法学理论上讨论这个问题。纯粹经济损失是经济发展和社会交往日益密切的结果,主要讨论的是侵权法中的经济利益损失,然而它与侵权法上的—般性损害具有本质的区别。研究纯粹经济损失,明确哪些经济利益受到法律的保护,哪些经济利益排除在法律保护的范围之外,对于司法机关的具体实践和社会主体的行为具有重要意义。本文从纯粹经济损失的定义和特征出发,坚持比较的、法律解释的以及体系化的研究方法,对我国纯粹经济损失及其可能构建的赔偿责任制度进行了一定的思考。除引言部分外,本文共分为五个部分,其主要如下:第一部分,纯粹经济损失的定义和特征。纯粹经济损失是纯粹经济利益上的损害,它具有直接性、独立性和不确定性等特征,正是由于这些特殊的性质使得纯粹经济损失在法律是一般难以获得赔偿。第二部分,纯粹经济损失的比较法考察。由于国情以及历史的原因,德法英美各国对待纯粹经济损失的态度既有相似之处,又存在一些立法和法学理论上的差异。德国法主要采取的是区别法益的保护模式将纯粹经济排除在一般侵权赔偿范围之外;法国法主要采取的是一种开放性的保护模式,在立法上对纯粹经济损失进行概括保护;英美各国在法律实践中主要采取责任排除规则,“原则”不赔,“例外”赔偿。我国实体法上没有纯粹经济损失的提法,但是却有许多在内容上可以推断出保护 纯粹经济利益的法律和司法解释。法院的审判实践中也涌现出越来越 多涉及纯粹经济损失赔偿的案件,总的来说,我国法院在司法实践中 采取的是比较严格的判断标准。第三部分,纯粹经济损失的基本样态。 纯粹经济损失的样态就是纯粹经济损失存在的主要形式。实践中的纯 粹经济损失种类各异,形态多样,难以准确的划分种类。为了更好的认 识纯粹经济损失的内涵和外延,本文拟将最具有代性的几种表现形 式总结了出来。第四部分,纯粹经济损失赔偿责任制度的价值分析和 法律分析。从价值分析的角度来讲把一般性的纯粹经济损失排除在赔 偿范围之外可以更好维护社会秩序的稳定。从法律分析的角度来讲, 结合法院在和侵权法行为规范对行为人的行为进行综合判断,进而确 定纯粹经济损失是否能够得到赔偿,将达到条件的纯粹经济利益纳入 法律的保护范围,能够更好的保障当事人的利益。第五部分,对于受害 人的其他救济方式。期望通过保险制度以及社会救济制度来消除那些 会带来消极后果的损害,以期在稳定社会秩序的基础上最大程度地保 障受害人利益。 【英文摘要】Pure economic loss is the concept of European law, but a very few countries in the statute expressly provides for pure economic loss, other countries, and more only in the legal theory on this issue. Pure economic loss is economic development and the results of the increasingly close social contacts, the main discussion is the economic interests of tort law in the loss, but it’s general tort damages have essential differences. Of pure economic loss, a clear what are the economic interests protected by law and which are excluded from economic benefits outside the scope of legal protection for the concrete practice of the judiciary and norms of social subjects is important. In this paper, the definition of pure economic loss and characteristics, stick to compare legal interpretation and systematic research methods, pure economic loss in China and the possible construction of a liability regime, which must be thinking.In addition to introduction, the paper is divided into five parts, the main contents are as follows:The first part describes the definition of pure economic loss and special sign. Pure economic loss is purely economic interests of the damage, it has direct, independent and uncertainties and other characteristics, it is precisely because these the special nature of the law makes pure economic loss is generally difficult to obtain compensation.The second part describes Germany, France, Britain and the United States to deal with the basic attitude of pure economic loss, on the basis of legislation and the secretary of law practice, pure economic loss issues some sort. Because conditions and historical reasons, Germany and France, Britain, and America to treat purely economic loss of the attitude of both similarities and some differences in legislation and legal theory. German law is the main difference to the protection of legal interests model will be purely economic exclusion in the general scope of tort liability; French law takes a major open the protected mode, the legislation Summarized on the protection of pure economic loss; American countries to take responsibility for the legal practice primarily exclusionary rule “principle” does not pay, “patients outside the “compensation. Of substantive law, there is no reference to pure economic loss, but there are many in the content can be inferred on the protection of purely economic interests benefits of the legal and judicial interpretation. The trial court also emerged the practice of more and more involved in the case of compensation for pure economic loss, in general, in the judicial practice of the court adopted a more stringent criterion.The third part discusses the basic kind of pure economic loss state. Like state of pure economic loss is purely economic losses are the main form. Real Practice in different types of pure economic loss, morphological diversity, the division is difficult to accurately type. In order to better understand the connotation of pure economic loss and extension, this article intends to show the most representative form of summary of some out.The fourth part of pure economic loss liability regime had built a seat ideas. I mainly from value analysis and the perspective of legal analysis of pure economic loss Compensation System for a series of ideas. Value analysis from the perspective of pure economic loss to the general schedule in addition to the scope of the compensation can better maintain social order and stability. From the perspective of legal analysis, combined with the court and the tort law rules fan of the perpetrator’s conduct comprehensive judgments, and to determine whether pure economic loss compensation, the conditions to reach purely economic interests benefits included in the scope of protection the law can better protect the interests of the parties.Part V describes the main remedies for the victims of the other. Expectations through the insurance system and social relief system to eliminate those who would take to the negative consequences of damage to a stable social order based on the maximum protection of the interests of victims. 【关键词】纯粹经济损失 侵权法 赔偿责任制度 【英文关键词】pure economic loss tort law liability regime 【目录】纯粹经济损失及其赔偿责任制度的构建 内容摘要 4-6 Abstract 6-7 引言 9-10 一、纯粹经济损失的定义和特征 10-13 (一) 纯粹经济损失的定义 10-11 (二) 纯粹经济损失的特征 11-13 二、纯粹经济损失的比较法考察 13-23 (一) 德国法上的纯粹经济损失 13-15 (二) 法国法上的纯粹经济损失 15-16 (三) 英国法上的纯粹经济损失 16-17 (四) 美国法上的纯粹经济损失 17 (五) 我国大陆立法及司法实践中的纯粹经济损失 17-23 三、纯粹经济损失样态分析 23-31 (一) 法与侵权法上竞合的纯粹经济损失 23-27 (二) 侵害他人之物对物之所有人造成的纯粹经济损失 27-28 (三) 侵害他人或者他人之物对第三人造成的纯粹经济损失 28-29 (四) 违反专家责任所引发的纯粹经济损失 29-30 (五) 产品缺陷造成的纯粹经济损失 30-31 (六) 不正当竞争引发的纯粹经济损失 31 四、纯经济损失赔偿问题的价值分析和法律分析 31-43 (一) 纯粹经济损失赔偿问题的价值分析 31-35 (二) 纯粹经济损失赔偿问题的法律分析 35-43 五、不予赔偿时受害人的救济措施 43-46 (一) 保险制度对纯粹经济损失赔偿制度的影响 44 (二) 纯粹经济损失的其他救济制度 44-46 致谢 46-47 参考文献 47-49 【采买全文】 1.3.9.9.38.8.4.8 1.3.8.1.13.7.2.1 同时提供论文写作一对一辅导和论文发表服务.保过包发 【说明】本文仅为中国学术文献总库合作提供，无涉版权。作者如有异议请与总库或学校联系。