碱醇处理的木薯淀粉结晶结构的变化
天然产物研究与开发NatProdResDev2007,19:25-28
文章编号:1001-6880(2007)01-0025-04
碱醇处理的木薯淀粉结晶结构的变化
徐立宏h,张本山,杨连生
华南理-l"大学化学科学学院;华南理工大学轻工与食品学院,广州510640
摘要:木薯淀粉在一定温度下用乙醇和碱的混合液处理.用HC1中和,醇洗,最后在
50?左右的烘箱中干燥6
h,X射线衍射结果
明经碱醇处理的木薯淀粉其微品,亚微晶,非晶的组成发生了
变化.不同的处理条件,结晶
组成的变化不同.较低浓度的醇,较高浓度的碱或较高反应温度得到非品化程度高
一些的淀粉.在偏光显微
镜下观察到较少的偏光十字,表明淀粉的结晶结构发生了变化.
关键词:微晶;亚微晶;非晶
中图分类号:Q946.91文献标识码:A
CrystallineStructureChangesofTapiocaStarchGranule byAlcoholic-Mk~neTreatment
xuLi—hong',ZHANGBen—shah2,
YANGLian—sheng2
CoReofChemistryScience;CollegeofLightIndustryand FoodScienceSouthChinaUni"ersityofTechnology,Gnangzhou510640,China
Abstract:TapiocastarchwastreatedwithamixtureofethanolandNaOHsolutionsatacontroll
edtemperature.Thetrea—
tedstarchwastllenneutralizedwithHC1.washedwithethanol.anddriedat50?
f0r6h.X.raydiffractionexperiment
showedthattheproportiononmierocrystal,submierocrystalandnon-crystalofthetapiocast
archtreatedbyalcoholic—
alkalinewaschanged.Lowerconcentrationofethanol,higherconcentrationofNaOH,orhig
hertemperaturegavethere—
suhingstarcheshighernon?erystallinity.LessMaltesecross~wereobservedunderpolarized
—lightmicroscopy,indicating
thechangesofcrystallinestructure.
Keywords:mierocrystal;submierocrystal:non.crystal Introduction
Starchisakindofnaturalcrystallinehighpolymer.The starchgranuleiscomposedofmicrocrystal,submicro—
crystalandnon—crystal【.
Methodsofstudyingstarch
crystallinepropertiesincludeX—raydiffraction,micros.
copy,scanningelectronmicrographandDSC[2.5】.
Late
studiesoncrystallinestarchwerereported[?6_2..Theo—
riginalstudyofnon—crystallinestarchistoobtainthe
non—crystallinestarchstandardfordeterminingcrystal—
linity.Starchwastreatedinball—millover24handthe
crystalstructureofstarchisdestroyed.In1994,S. VeelaertreportedthatMaltesecrosseslostwhendialde—
ReceivedJune5,2006;AcceptedNovember6,
2006
FoundationItem:ThisworkwasfinanciallysupportedbyNationalNatu.
ralScienceFoundation(29976016).
CorrespondingauthorTel:86-20-87113637;E-mail:chlhxu@scut.edu.
cn
hydestarcheswerepreparedbyoxidationwithperio—
date[.DoctorStuereportedthephenomenaofbire—
fringencelossofstarchwhentreatingthestarchsuspon—
dedinwaterwithultra—highpressure[引.
ShinjiTama.
kireportedstarchcrystallinestructuregraduallydisap—
pearedbyball-mill320htreatment[引.ZhangBen—
shanreportedstarchnon—crystallizationwhenstarch
cross—linkedwithphosphomsoxychloride[.
Thepurposeofthepresentstudywastoinvestigatethe proportionchangesamongmicmcrystal,submicmcrystal andnon?-crystalinalcoholic??alkalinetreatedtapioca starch.Theeffectsofalcohol.andalkaliconcentra—
tions,andtemperaturewerestudied.
MaterialsandMethods
Materials
TapiocastarcheswereobtainedfromGuangxiMingyang BiotechCo.,Ltd..Otherchemicalswereallreagent
NatProdResDevVo1.19
gradeandwereusedwithoutfurthertreatment. Treatmentoftapiocastarch
Tapiocastarchesweretreatedwithamixtureofethanol andNaOHsolution(3mol/L)atdifferentproportions andat25,30,or35oC.
Tapiocastarches(25g,dsb)weresuspendedin137g of4O%(W/W)ethanolsolutionina250mLbeaker equippedwithamechanicalstirrer.NaOHsolution(3 mol/L,75g)wasweiedandaddedat70D/min.
Themixturewasthenallowedtostandfor15minwith gendestirring.Additional25mL40%(W/W)ethanol solutionwasaddedslowlytothestarchsuspension.Af-
ter10minofstirring,theslurrywasleftatroomtem—
perature.FilteredusingBuchnerfunne1.estarchwas
resuspendedinaqueous40%(W/w)ethanolsolution
andneutralizedwithHClf3mol/Linabsoluteetha—
nol1.Theneutralizedstarchwaswashedwith75%eth—
anolsolutions.Itwasthenwashedinabsoluteethanol
anddriedinanovenat5O?f0rover6h.Thedried
350
300
25o
200
g150
堇1OO
5O
0
.
50
350
3oo
250
言200
芒150—.
100
50
O
01O2O30405060
Diffractionangle(28)
starchwassmashedusingpulverizerandsievedwith
125txmscreenandstoredindrieratroomtemperature
forfurtheranalyses.
X-Raydiffraction
X—Raydiffractionpatternsofstarchesweretakenona diffractometerwithaCuX-raytubeandanickelfoil filteroperatedat30kVand30mA.ex-raypatterns ofthemixtureswererecorded,andthescanningregion ofthediffractionangle(2口)wasfrom4.to60..
Microscopy
LightmicrographsweretakenusingOlympusVanox BHS一2microscopyoperatinginbrightfieldandpolariza—
tionmodes.
ResultsandDiscussion
X-Rayanalysis
Starchiscomposedofmicrocrystal,submicrocrystaland non—crysta1.ThetheoryofX—raydiffractionindicates 350
3o0
250
200
g150
羔100
5O
O
.
50
Diffractionangle(28)Diffractionangle(28) 350
3OO
250
2o0
150
100
50
0
-
50
350
3oo
250
言200
芒150—
100
50
O
0102030405060
Diffractionangle(28)
Dractionanale(28)
Fig.1X-raydiffractionpatternsofalcoholic-alkalinetreatedstarch
0.Nativetapiocastarch;1—6.Alcoholic—alkalinetreatedtapiocastarch
鲁?ca1ul
?c91ul
丽c.1ul
Vo1.19XULi.hongetal:CrystallineStructureChangesofTapiocaStarchGranulebyAlcohol
ic'AlkalineTreatment
thatverysmallorimperfectcrystals fraction.Incontrast,perfectcrystals
tionpeak.AccordingtoDr. givebroadeneddif-
givesharpdiffrac-
ZhangBenshan'smeth-
od[引.
anX.raypatternisdividedintothreearea:mi—
crocrystal(C);submicrocrystal(S);non-crystal(N). Thevhavedifferentcharacteristics.Cshowssharp peak,SandNshowbroadenedpeak,non-crystalpro. ducesdispersivediffractionpeak.Inadditiontoprovi- dinginformationaboutthecrystalstructureofstarch granules,X—raydiffractioncangiveinformationabout therelativeamountsofcrystallineandamorphouspha- ses.ByintegratingtheX-rayscatteringintensitysepa. ratelyoverthepeaksandoverthebackground,theval. uesobtainedcanbeinterpretedas"microcrystallini- ty","submicrocrystallinity"and"non-crystallinity". X.raydiffractionpatternsarepresentedinFig.1. Thecompositionsofthetreatedstarchareobtained fromcomputerprogram.Theresultsshowthatthecon tentofmicrocrystallinestructuredecreasecompared withnativestarch.Submicrocrystalalsodecreasesex—
ceptsample1.Theamountsofnon-crystal
causestaTchisaweakionexchanger['】
increase.Be一
,
whenstarch
moleculeswereplacedinastrongalkalinesolution, protonsofthe-OHgroupweredissociatedandleftneg? ativechargesonstarchmolecules.Therepulsionbe—
tweennegativechargesresultedinswellingofstarch granules.Theswellingofthegranulesexertedatension onneighbouringcrystallitesofstarchmoleculesand tendedtodistortthem[81.Furtllerswellingledtothe
breakupofpartofmicrocrystallinestructureandsome
partofmicrocrystalorsubmicrocrystaltochangeto
non—crysta1.Thedifferentalcoholic—alkalinetreatments
areshowninr1,able1.
Table1Treatmentofstarchnon-cry~nllDation
Table2Compositionofstarchbyalcoholic.alknlinetreat.
ment
O
l
2
3
4
5
6
16.79
14.12
14.39
13.26
l3.76
9.2
13.84
29.53
26.16
31.65
2o.75
27.3l
28.22
23.12
46.32
40.28
46.04
34.01
41.07
37.42
36.96
5368
59.72
53.96
65.99
58.93
62.58
63.04
C.Microcrystal;S.Sub.microcrystal;C+s.Crystal;N.Non-crystal
0.Nativetapiocastarch;1—6.Alcoholic-alkalinetreatedtapioca starch
Thenon.crystalcontentsofsample3,5and4were 65.99.62.58and58.93%(Table2),respectivelyfor thetreatment34,29and20?(Table1).Therefore,
highertemperaturegavethestarchesthehighernon. crystallinity.
Thenon—crystalcontentvariedwithdifferentconcentra- tionsofethano1.Whenethanolconcentrationincreased from5.5x(sample1)to7.0x(sample2),thenon. crystalcontentdecreasedfrom59.72%to53.96%. Highconcentrationsofethanolrestrictedthestarch granuleswelling.
Alkalinewasanotherimportantfactorforthechangesof crystallinestructure.Treatmentwithagreatervolumeof NaOHsolution(3mol/L)ledtostarcheswithhigher non.crystallinity.HigherNaOHconcentrationsin-
creasedtheswellingofthegranules.Therefore,agrea. ternon.crystallinity(sample6)wasobservedthanthe contrast(sample4).Compositionchanges
tapiocastarcharelistedinTable3.
ofthetreated
Table3CompositionchangesofalcohoHc?811~etreated starch
Polarisationmicroscopy
Polarizedlightmicrographsofthestarchbyalcoholic. alkalinetreatmentshowedthelOSSoftheMaltese—CroSS
NatProdResDelIV01.19
thanthatofnativestarch.Fig.2showedthatthetreated starchgranulesremainedintact.
Fig.2Polarizedfightmicrophotosofstarchesbyalco- holic.alkalinetreatment
0.Nativestarch;4.Mcohohc-alkalinetreatedtapiocastarch Conclusion
Alcoholic—?alkalinetreatmentresultedinthes~rchcrys-. tallinestructurechanges.Highertemperature,lower concentrationsofethanol,andgreaterconcentrationsof NaOHproducedthestarchwithhighernon-?crystallini.. t)r.
AcknowledgmentsWewouldliketothankMaster DengLinhaiofMathematicalScientificAcademyof SouthChinaUniversityofTechnologyforhiscomputer programdesignoncMculafingstarchcrystallinestruc—
tureaccordingtoX-raysdiffractionpattem. 2
3
ZhangBS,ZhangYQ.Amethodofdeterminingcrystallinity ofstarchinmulti—crystalsystem.JSouthChinaUnivTech, NatSc,2001,29(5):55.58.
ZhangBS,XuLH,YangLS.Studyonthepropertiesofphysi. calstateofhiShcross-linkedandnon.gelatinizedstarchesby DSC.FoodSci,2002,23(5):91-93.
GernatC,RadostaS.Starch,1993.45:309-314. 4GernatC,RadostaS,DamasehunG.Starch,1990,42:175—
178.
5J,llialtoBO,PerezCM,BanosL.Starch,l99o,42:49—52.
6ZhangBS,XuLH,GaoDW.Effectofhighcross—linkingon
nonerystallizationofcornstarches.JWuxiUniv1.~htIn- dus,2001,20:233-237.
7ZhangBS,XuLH,YangLS.Studyonthemeltingcharacters ofstarchcrysta1.JZhengzhouGrainCoil,2001,22(4):15- 18.
8ZhangBS,ZhangYQ.Submicrocrystallinestructureofstar—
ches.JSouthChinaUniv死,NatSci,2001,29(6):27—
30.
9ZhangBS,ZhangYQ,ZengXA.Studyonthesubmicrocrys—
tallinityofpregelatinizedcornstarch.JZhengzhouGrain Coll,2000,21(4):23-26.
10ZhangBS,ZhangYQ,ZengXA.Influeceeofdifferentwater contentonthecrystallinestructureofnativecornstarch.J ZhengzhouGrainCoil,2000,21(2):21-23.
11ZhangBS,ZhangYQ,YangLS.Studyonthecrystalline Structureandpropertyofcorn,cassavaandpotatostarch granules.FoodSci,2001,22(2):11—14.
12VeelaertS,PollingM,WitDD.Structuralandphysiochemi- calchangesofpotatostarchalongperiodateofidation.
Starch,1995,46:263_268.
13StuteR,KlinglerRW,BoguslawskiS.Effectsofhighpres—
surestreatmentonstarches.Starch,1996,48:399408. 14TamakiS,HisamatsuM,TerauishiK.Structuralchangeof maizestarchgranulesbybali-milltreatment.Starch,1998, 50:342-348.
15ZhangBS.StudyontheMechanismandPropertiesofPhysi- calStateofHiShCross??Linkedandnon??GelatinizedStar-- ches.Guangzhou:SouthChinaUniversityofTechnology, PhD.1999.
16ZhangBS.StudyonCrystallinityofStarches.Guangzhou: SouthChinaUnivemi~ofTechnology,Master,1994. 17OostenBJ.Tentativehypothesistoexplainhowelectmnlytes affectthegelatinizationtemperatureofstarchesinwater. Starch,1982,34:233.
18ChenJ,JaneJ.Propertiesofgranularcold-water-soluble starchesbyalcohoHe-alkalinetreatment.CerealChem, 1994,71:62326.