逮捕条件论文：关于M县检察院审查逮捕案件质量的调查报告

逮捕条件论文：关于M县检察院审查逮捕案件质量的调查报告 逮捕条件论文:关于M县检察院审查逮捕案件质量的调查报告 【中文摘要】为保证审查逮捕案件的质量,更好的贯彻落实宽严相济的思想,基于审查逮捕工作实践,结合相关的刑事法律法规和刑事司法政策,笔者对M县检察院审查逮捕案件的调研状况予以,找出影响其审查逮捕案件质量的原因,并提出建议和对策,以期提高检察机关审查逮捕案件的质量。笔者在论文的第一部分首先对审查逮捕案件质量的概念予以界定,分为实质标准、证据标准、必要标准和时效标准四个方面,并结合现行相关法律法规对这四个标准进行了论证。第二部分对M县检察院审查逮捕质量的调研状况进行了说明,得出该院审查逮捕案件质量存在错捕、逮捕缺陷与程序瑕疵率相对偏高的结论。第三部分笔者通过分析得出影响审查逮捕案件质量问题的原因是逮捕的法定条件难以把握、审查逮捕程序正当性不足、执法理念存在偏差、替代羁押性强制措施运用不足以及逮捕承载着过多的功能与预期,以上五个方面是最重要的原因。第四部分提出了如何改变逮捕案件质量低下的现状,提高审查逮捕案件质量的对策。笔者以为,应该按照“符合法律、符合规律,符合办案需要”的原则,在现有法律框架下,努力寻求保障刑事诉讼顺利进行与保障犯罪嫌疑人人权的最佳联结点。建议针对审查逮捕工作的特点,修改现行相关法律,完善逮捕的法定条件、建立相对合理更加科学的审查逮捕案件质量评价标准,完善审查逮捕程序,注重其正当性,转变对逮捕传统观念与功能预期,强化替代性羁押措施的运用,调整实务部门相关考核指标,以正确评 价审查逮捕工作,提高审查逮捕案件的质量。结语提出了调研的体会, 在立法赋予公权力机关义务后,应对义务的履行情况给予正确的评价 标准,并进行有效监督,事后保障,只有如此,制度才能健康运行。 【英文摘要】Insuring for the quality of arrest cases’ review and better implementation of the criminal policy of combining punishment with leniency, based on the practice of arrest cases’ review, combining with the relevant criminal laws and criminal justice policy, the author will analyze the Research of County M Procuratorate’s quality of arrest cases’ review and then find the reasons that affect the quality of arrest cases’ review and make recommendations to improve the conditions and to improve the quality of arrest cases’ review for Procuratorates.In the Chapter One, the author defines the standards of arrest cases’ review, which are divided into four elements that concludes the essence standard,the evidence standard, the necessary standard and the substantive standard.Combining with the existing relevant laws and regulations,the four standards were demonstrated.In the Chapter Two, the Research on County M Procuratorate’s quality of arrest cases’ review are described. The author concludes the conclusion that there are wrong arrests and relatively high rates of procedural errors in the review of arrest.In the Chapter Three, after the analysis, the author proposes the reasons of impacting the quality of arrest cases’ review, which are the difficulty to grasp the statutory requirements of arrest, the lack of due process in the review of arrest cases, the concept of biased law enforcement, the lack of useing alternative measures of arrest and the over-expectation and over-function of arrest, the above five points are the most important reasons.In the Chapter Four, the author presents how to change the statuation of low quality of arrest and improve the quality of arrest cases’ review. The keys should be based on the principle of “consistent with the law, consistent with the discipline, consistent with investigators need”.In the existing legal framework, there should have to seek the best join point of protecting the smooth progressing of criminal procedure and protecting the suspects’ human rights. Regarding the features of review of arrest, to modify existing laws, improve the legal conditions of arrest, to establish a relatively reasonable quality standards of arrest cases’ review with a more scientific evaluation, to improve the procedures of the review of arrest focusing on its legitimacy, to change the traditional conception, function and expectation of arrest.While there should have to strengthen the use of alternative measures of arrest, and adjust the quality index in practice, for a proper evaluation and assessment of the review of arrest, eventually to improve the quality of arrest cases’ review.The conclusion proposes a principle which is demanded in the operation of systems, that is, there should have some correct evaluation criteria, effective supervision and perform security,while there should have some restraint measures of carrying out obligations to ensure situation of the law enforcement after legislation, that’s the author’s research experience too. 【关键词】逮捕条件 逮捕质量 审查逮捕 批准逮捕 【英文关键词】Conditions of arrest Quality of arrest Review of arrest Approval of arres 【备注】索购全文在线加我:1.3.9.9.3.8848 同时提供论文一对一写作指导和论文发委托服务 【目录】关于M县检察院审查逮捕案件质量的调查报告 摘要 6-7 Abstract 7-8 引言 11-12 一、审查逮捕案件 质量标准的界定 12-15 (一) 实质标准 12-13 (二) 证 据标准 13 (三) 必要标准 13-14 (四) 时效标准 14-15 二、M 县检察院审查逮捕案件质量概况 15-17 三、影响审查逮捕案件质量的原因 17-23 (一) 法定逮捕条 件难把握 17-19 1. 逮捕的证据标准过于严格 17-18 2. 逮捕的必要标准缺乏可操作性 18-19 3. 逮捕的实质标准偏低 19 (二) 审查逮捕程序正当性不足 19-20 1. 犯罪嫌疑人客体化 19-20 2. 律师不能介入审查逮捕程序 20 3. 审查逮捕程序的行政化 20 (三) 执法理念存在偏差 20-22 1. “重打击轻保护”的执法观念根深蒂固 20-21 2. “重配合轻制约”的执法观念长期存在 21 3. “涉罪即送”、“构罪即捕”一直占据执法理念的主导地位 21-22 (四) 替代羁押性强制措施运用不足 22-23 (五) 实务部门考核指标不尽合理 23 四、提高审查逮捕案件质量的对策 23-30 (一) 完善法定逮捕条件 24-25 1. 建议将证据标准修改为“有证据有犯罪嫌疑” 24 2. 建议将必要标准以列举的方式予以细化 24-25 3. 建议将实质标准提高到三年以上有期徒刑 25 (二) 注重程序公正、推进程序诉讼化改造 25-28 1. 保障犯罪嫌疑人的诉讼主体地位 26 2. 保障律师的权利 26-27 3. 推进审查逮捕程序的诉讼化改造 27-28 (三) 转变对逮捕的传统观念 28 1. 打击与保护并重 28 2. 在配合的基础上注重制约 28 3. 全面树立少捕慎捕理念 28 (四) 强化替代性羁押措施的运用 28-29 (五) 调整实务部门相关考核指标 29-30 结语 30-31 致谢 31-32 参考文献 32-33