各大国之间武力的使用

The use of force Introduction A country's governance and deal with the relationship between countries is inseparable from the force of the maintenance. Especially as risk increase, environmental degradation and terrorist activities endangering the safety of People's Daily is in case of increase. More and more people dependent on the protection of the state and increasing social control instead let that people can understand and accept. All sorts of hostile elements are from economy, politics, ideology and culture, social life with sabotage and the reaction activity of overthrowing, the political power of the country, so this is a great social unrest. Don't vigorous struggle and sanctions, so it can't talk about social stability. For the national interests of maintaining, ther are more without force. American scholar hammer mills of the political power of the tragedy is a serious international relations theory. His arrival in response to the theory of Eurasia possible regional hegemony pose a threat to the United States the American classic proposition. The author stressed at the beginning of the 21st century. Germany and China could pose a challenge to the United States and put forward that the United States should play the role of "balance of hand". And the role of play is absolutely inseparable from the use of force to deter the two countries. This paper is to discuss whether countries and countries need to force to governance and discuss the pros and cons of its use of force. The use of force that is between countries International relations is a state-to-state relations form the relationship between country and the world. Its relations with the domestic fundamental difference is that there is a state of the domestic and the international society is the lack of the highest authority in a state of anarchy. Living under the anarchy, pursuit is the basic goal of survival and development, security and power ( James and John, 2013). Governments are now using the law to govern the country. The rule of law is formulated in accordance with people's will and social development rule by law to govern the country, not in accordance with the individual will. In order to safeguard national security and the maintenance of world peace and promote the righteous cause of human progress, countries set up court, police, army, and handle your bad social problems, such as prison. Mandatory effect is that law, punish illegal and criminal behavior. The specification of object is the behavior of offenders. Mainly embodied in the adjustment of the ruling class and ruled class relations, the relationship between the adjustment of the ruling class and their Allies, adjust the relationship between the internal ruling class. Only by establishing a fair and efficient judicial system, the real form a fair and just social environment. The people can perform various social classes and harmony, to achieve social stability. Now facing the reality of national security threats on the rise, the superposition of all kinds of contradictory problems together. National security situation is more complicated, the asia-pacific region to become the new focus of international strategic competition and game. Peripheral territorial sovereignty and maritime rights disputes, big geopolitical competition, take on military security, terrorist threats, such as more prominent, increases the possibility of a disorderly life battle. So countries are trying to form a powerful military force in response to the safe hidden trouble that may occur at any time. This is the inevitable requirement to adapt to the development trend of the world's new military revolution. In today's world, the new military revolution presents many new characteristics of the new trend. Military technology with each passing day, weapons and equipment to shorten the development cycle. Military theory innovation continues to accelerate, new military theories especially operational theory (Derouen, 1995). Space, network and the polar space as a new commanding heights international strategic competition. Space military advantage and network space development initiative control competition intensified. In the tide of the world's new military revolution, who is conservative, stuck in the past, who will miss the precious opportunities, in a passive strategy. Only in the sense of urgency to seize the current world science and technology revolution, the industrial revolution, the military revolution booming historic opportunity, accelerate reform of the national defense and the army, in order to win in the 21st century military competition (Art, 2009). Disscussing the topic compared to the book. "The political power of the tragedy" is a classic of offensive realism works. In essence it is a realism, belongs to the tradition of realism thinker. In this book, professor John hammer mills, listing a lot of facts, and with rigorous logic expounds its "offensive realism" theory, left a deep impression to the person (Mearsheimer, 2011). The authors pointed out that in a world without international authoritative rule of other countries, the powers are beggar-thy-neighbour, chasing power, and become the dominant nation.Inevitable conflict between great powers in the process, it is the tragedy of the world. Professor hammer mills with its transparent style of writing, explains why security competition is closely related to the international system, and the competition between the major power of different patterns. His point of view, pose at the same time convincing and supported by a large number of historical evidence. However, in view of this article because no country can achieve global hegemony, so that the whole world is filled with a permanent power competition. In the contemporary, safeguard national interests, is the basic principle of dealing with international affairs. In both highly developed western countries, the rapid growth of developing countries, is the Paramount national interest, safeguard national interests as the starting point and the foothold of national foreign strategy. International politics is a branch of politics and the political is rooted in human nature. Human nature is affected by factors such as their environmental beliefs, is very complex. Now people in humanity itself cannot make an accurate answer. In war and peace on the eternal theme of international relations, the liberal school of thought says that peace can be achieved, the realist school of thought argues that war is hard to avoid. This paper is more emphasis on the importance of world peace. Force the use of the most fundamental purpose is to maintain peace and not be dominating the world powers. To take advantage of good human nature influenced the political decision makers, in the maintenance of national interests at the same time to allow for harmony. What do they debate or agree on? This paper is in some places and point of view is consistent in the book, but some places are not agree with the author's point of view. "The political power of the tragedy is hope to more contact with foreign scholars of international relations theory research trends. Policymakers can at the same time for those who may affect the theoretical understanding of American foreign policy makers, and in the country's foreign policy to the enemy and know yourself (Peter and Christopher, 2007). This is consistent with the harmonious coexistence of this article is. Only establish good diplomatic relations can provide premise to ensure the harmony of the world. And the author says the power of realism, although exists but is not should be advocated. Through the efforts of the countries can ease superpower tragedy. The evidence from book that support the paper argument Definition of a "political tragedy" is the book: live to reach its highest goal state, and have no choice but to the pursuit of power, to invade other countries, to establish hegemony, which in a tragic ending. The author put forward the international politics is power politics, power allocation decision power politics. Anarchy and the security scarcity in today's world, lead to distrust between the great powers, resulting in the safety of the endless competition between the powers and power chasing, so the "power" is the theme of the book. For power, the authors define it as two aspects: potential power and military power. Potential power is based on a country's wealth, and the total population size, it is closely combined with military power, but obviously the author prefer to balance the war play a leading role of military power, and are more bullish on land force in military power (Robert and Kelly, 2015). This is consistent with the idea of this paper, are emphasized in the national governance need to use force to management. Existence is the primary goal of a country, as a result of the relationship between countries tend to benefit, and thus lead to the mutual suspicion between countries, pursuit of power. And because each country will never be able to estimate pose a threat to their country of how strong, so can only be expanding their own strength to ensure our position in the international and security. The pursuit of power and security competition, can lead to the escalating war threats, causes the turbulence of the world. History tells us that only those who are keen to grasp war form evolution trend and inflection point, and faster into military reform practice of the army, to grasp the initiative of military transformation, in an impregnable position in the war. Therefore, this article is the author of this view. Some ways are aligned with or distinct from theirs In this book, hammer mills trumpeting China threat. He thinks China because of its growing economic and military power, is bound to dominate Asia, consolidate their supremacy, causes of war in east Asia. He attacked America's China policy, his theory to the practice of U.S. policy toward China contact not only contain expressed its strong dissatisfaction and concerns. Think such a policy is the result of misguided, ambition, just encourages China to establish regional hegemony to use American power in Asia, and America's foreign intention. This in itself is a kind of destruction versions of a harmonious world. Every country needs to develop and grow. If each contain the development of other countries, which will inevitably hinder the progress of the society. Is not conducive to the improvement of people living standard and social security of the country. At the same time, I am opposed to the author's proposition: not challenge power theory. With the transformation of international system, the world is going through a series of major changes. In the past, may be a weak country does not take the initiative to provoke conflict with the strength of the country, because of the weak can't afford to fail. But in modern times, we can see from the "911 incident", it is not, as the author said. International terrorism is in the world, the international terrorism threat to the world.Tens of thousands of people died in terrorist attacks. It is not the weak country with traditional military force to start with the power of conflict and war, but together with science and technology and information of the world's terrorist activities. Launch terrorist attacks countries or organizations are not the United States is the most powerful country for it has no with kid gloves (Christain, 2009). So, in order to maintain the harmony of the world, the use of force is the inevitable choice for each country. Conclusion 继续阅读