医疗过失论文：医疗注意义务 医疗水平

医疗过失论文：医疗注意义务 医疗水平 医疗过失论文:医疗注意义务 医疗水平 【中文摘要】医疗侵权责任是一般侵权责任的一个组成部分,作为医疗侵权责任的构成要件之一的医疗过失为侵权责任法中的过错在医疗专业领域的具体体现。尽管理论界对侵权责任的构成要件莫衷一是,有三要件说、四要件说、五要件说等不同学说。但各种学说均将过错作为一般侵权责任中不可或缺的构成要件之一。过错在侵权责任中核心地位始终如一。尤其是在过错责任的归责原则下,过错即为侵权责任的构成要件之一,又是过错责任归责的最终要件。因此,医疗过失在医疗侵权责任中的地位无疑是举足轻重,对其的认定也有着十分重要的法律意义。本文将从四个部分对医疗侵权责任中过失的认定进行论述。第一部分首先以我国当前的医疗侵权责任中过失认定的立法状况为切入点,对我国法律上的医疗过失的概念及医疗过失认定在立法上的相关规定及其存在的问题予以分析。然后,选取了一些典型医疗纠纷的案件,运用实证分析的方法剖析了我国医疗侵权责任中过失认定的司法现状及其存在的突出问题。第二部分主要对医疗侵权责任中过失认定的基本理论进行分析和阐述。该部分首先从比较法的角度,通过大陆法系与英美法系的法律及司法实践相对比,得出尽管各国对过失的本质属性的认识存在较大分歧,但在司法实践中对医疗侵权责任中过失的认定都采用了客观的行为标准。其次,通过对我国现行法律法规与司法解释以及司法实践状况的分析,认为医疗侵权中过失的认定适用客观的行为标准,即医疗过失的认定以医疗注意义务的违反为判断标准。最后,考虑到医疗行为毕竟不同于一般的社会行为, 有其自身的显著特点,提出在对医疗过失进行认定时,应考虑到医疗 行为的这些特点。第三部分对医疗过失认定中重要因素——医疗注意 义务与医疗水平进行研究。该部分阐述了医疗注意义务与医疗水平的 内涵,并详细分析了医疗注意义务的类型和法律渊源。最后论述医疗 注意义务与医疗水平的关系及二者对医疗过失认定的法律意义。第四 部分通过以上论述,该部分提出了医疗侵权责任中过失认定的立法建 议。针对我国当前立法上的问题,提出完善医疗侵权责任中的鉴定制 度的建议,以及患者知情权的进一步明确和系统地规定医生的注意义 务。 【英文摘要】Medical tort liability is usually a part of the tort liability, as a medical tort liability of the cornerstones of the responsibility for medical negligence in the error in the medical field of concrete. Despite theoretical circles on the components of the tort liability, there are three elements, repudiating four elements, five elements and so on the different theories. But various theories are to be as general tort liability fault is one of the indispensable constitutions. Especially in fault liability principle, the imputation of fault for tort liability is one of the components of the fault liability fixation, and the final requirement. Therefore, medical negligence in medical tort liability, the position is undoubtedly important for it’s that also has a very important legal significance. This paper discusses four parts, medical tort liability recognized in negligence.The first part of the first in the current medical tort liability in that legislation for the fault of our law, medical negligence, the concept and medical errors that the relevant provisions and its problems for analysis. Then, the author selects some typical cases of medical disputes; using empirical analysis method analyzed medical tort liability in determination of judicial status and fault existing prominent problems.The second part of the tort liability for medical treatment fault recognition of the related theory analysis and expounded. This part of the first from the Angle of comparison with continental law system, through the legal and judicial Anglo-American law system, it is concluded that despite relatively than practice essential attribute of nations to negligence understanding of the differences, there is greater in judicial practice in tort liability for medical treatment fault that has adopted objective standards of behavior. Secondly, the author based on the current laws and regulations and judicial interpretation and judicial practice status analysis, thought the cognizance of negligence in medical infringement for objective standards of behavior, namely the cognizance of medical treatment error in medical attention for judgment standard breach of duty. Finally, consider the medical behavior after all, different from the general social behavior, has its own remarkable characteristic of medical negligence, put forward to be deemed, should consider to these characteristics of medical behavior.The third part of medical negligence identified in the important factors-medical attention obligation and medical level research. This part of medical attention expounded the connotation of duty and medical level, and detailed analysis of the medical duty of care types and legal origin. The last part discusses the duty of care and medical level of medical and relationship of for medical negligence that both legal significanceThe fourth part through the discussion above, this part in medical tort liability proposed that the legislative proposals fault. Aim at the current legislation, and puts forward the problems in the tort liability perfect medical treatment Suggestions, and the patient’s right to know the advice further clear and systematically regulation doctor of the duty of care 【关键词】医疗过失 医疗注意义务 医疗水平 【英文关键词】medical negligence medical attention compulsory medical level 【目录】论医疗过失的认定 摘要 4-5 Abstract 5-6 1 引言 9-11 2 我国医疗过失认定中存在的问题 11-24 2.1 我国医疗过失认定的立法现状及其存在的问题 11-16 2.1.1 医疗过失概念的界定及存在的问题 12-13 2.1.2 对医疗过失认定在立法上的相关规定的分析 13-15 2.1.3 对医疗过失认定举证责任方面的分析 15-16 2.2 我国医疗过失认定的司法现状及其问题 16-23 2.2.1 医疗侵权案件的受理范围及法律适用问题 16-17 2.2.2 司法实践中医疗侵权过失的认定 17-23 小结 23-24 3 医疗过失认定的理论基础 24-33 3.1 医疗过失的概念 24-28 3.1.1 医疗过失的涵义 24-25 3.1.2 一般侵权行为中的过失及其认定标准 25-28 3.2 确定医疗过失标准应考虑的几种特定因素 28-31 3.2.1 医疗行为的职业伦理性 29 3.2.2 医疗行为的侵害性与风险性 29-30 3.2.3 医疗行为的专门性 30-31 小结 31-33 4 医疗过失认定标准确定的相关理论 33-41 4.1 医疗注意义务与医疗过失的认定 33-37 4.1.1 医疗注意义务的内涵 33-34 4.1.2 医疗注意义务的法律渊源 34-36 4.1.3 医疗注意义务的类型 36-37 4.2 医疗水平与医疗过失的认定 37-40 4.2.1 医疗水平的内涵 37-38 4.2.2 运用医疗水平理论应注意的几种因素 38-40 小结 40-41 5 医疗过失认定的立法完善 41-46 5.1 对医疗过失认定中的鉴定完善的建议 41-42 5.1.1 提高鉴定机构的中立性 41-42 5.1.2 确立医疗侵权案件的专家证人制 42 5.2 患者知情同意权的进一步明确 42-44 5.3 系统地规定医方的注意义务 44-46 结语 46-47 参考文献 47-49 致谢 49-50 、在学期间发表的学术论文及研究成果 50 【采买全文】 1.3.9.9.38.8.4.8 1.3.8.1.13.7.2.1 同时提供论文写作一对一辅导和论文发表服务.保过包发. 【】本文仅为中国学术文献总库合作提供，无涉版权。作者如有异议请与总库或学校联系。