清华考博英语历年作文

98，10 现代社会的竞争。Some people believe that it is necessary to encourage competition in a modern society.Other people think that it is not necessary,especially in our society.Your comments on these two views,and give examples to support your opinion. 99，5 电子书籍的前景。有人认为随着计算机技术的发展，电子书籍将取代现在的纸制书本。有些人认为书本的地位是不可取代的。我的看法 99，10 自强不息，厚德载物。作为一名博士研究生，如何自强不息；作为一名科学工作者，如何厚德载物。 00，5 21世纪中国高等教育将发生的两大重要变化。21世纪高等教育在社会发展中将起到更为重要的作用。在21世纪高等教育将会发生许多变化（举两例说明）。你对这些变化的认识及看法。 01，3 博士生应获取的知识。一些人认为博士生的知识以博为主；一些人认为博士生的知识以专为主，你的看法是... 02，3 我对博士研究生入学面试的看法。博士研究生人学面试是否必要？在博士研究生入学面试中，你认为最重要的是展示哪几个方面？你将如何展示这些方面？ 03，3 中国加入WTO对博士生培养的影响。中国加入WTO后，博士研究生的培养也会受到一定程度的影响。讨论一下会产生哪些方面的影响，是积极的还是消极的影响等。你个人的看法如何。 04，3 研究工作中对我今后工作与生活产生影响的事情。在科研和学习中使我最难忘的一件事情是-，使我难忘的原因是-，它对我后来的影响是-。 05，3 我攻读博士学位的目标。你攻读博士学位的目标是-，你确定这一目标的原因是-，你将如何努力实现。 06，3 优秀研究工作者应具备的品质。优秀的科研工作者需要具备什么素质？举例说明这种素质的重要性。如何培养这种素质。 07,4 有关学术腐败问题，作为一个博士生你认为如何？怎么做？（大致的记忆） 09 近些年学术界出现了，学者们盲目追求发表文章的数量，而忽视文章质量的现象，请以“quantity and quality of works”为题目阐明个人观点，书写工整、字数不少于300字。 参考范文： The past years witnessed considerable improvement in scientific research in this country. One typical sign is the mounting number of papers published in SCI and SSCI periodicals. However, the quality of many such papers and works is doubtable. One proof is that the average citation frequency of these papers has remained unchanged for years. This phenomenon has given rise to heated debate. Personally, I believe that this phenomenon should be viewed from more than one perspective. On the one hand, it must be admitted that there has appeared an undesirable trend in Chinese academic circle in the past years, that is, too much emphasis has been put on the number of papers published rather than the quality of these papers, or substantial efforts and contribution in scientific research. Taking a look around, one can find examples too many to enumerate. The number of papers, especially the number of papers published in SCI or SSCI periodicals has been regarded as the most important or the single criteria in uating a scientific researcher. It is even directly related to his salary and opportunity for promotion. This trend has led Chinese academy to an unhealthy road of development. As we can see, many scholars have become more of writers than researchers. Some even plagiarize in order to publish more papers. On the other hand, however, we should not hastily say no to the quantitative uation of scientific researchers. In fact, the number of papers is a critical index in measuring the achievement of a scholar or an academic institution. As we can see, nations with developed sciences rank among the top in SCI and SSCI publications. Quantitative uation is especially necessary in some disciplines in China where there are not sufficient experts to give an objective assessment. To sum up, we should not go to extremes in this matter. While we should continue to adopt the quantity of works as an index in uating scientific researchers, we should not lay as much emphasis on it as we did. Instead, more freedom and a looser environment should be provided for researchers so that they can give full play to their talent. Only in this way can we expect a boom of science in this country.